Peer Review Process
Adhigamy International Journal of Modern Research Perspectives (AIJMRP) follows a rigorous, fair, transparent, and unbiased peer review process to maintain the quality, originality, academic integrity, and scholarly value of published research. The journal is committed to promoting ethical publishing practices and ensuring that all submitted manuscripts are evaluated solely on the basis of academic merit, research quality, originality, and relevance to the scope of the journal.
The journal follows a peer review system in which submitted manuscripts are reviewed by qualified subject experts and members of the editorial and reviewer board. The review process helps in evaluating the significance, methodology, originality, clarity, ethical standards, and overall contribution of the research work.
Initial Editorial Screening
After submission, each manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening by the editorial office to ensure that the manuscript:
• Falls within the scope of the journal
• Follows the journal’s formatting and submission guidelines
• Meets basic academic and language standards
• Complies with publication ethics and plagiarism policy
• Contains sufficient originality and scholarly relevance
Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements may be returned to the authors for correction or may be rejected before the peer review stage.
Review Process
Manuscripts that successfully pass the initial screening are forwarded to expert reviewers for evaluation. Reviewers are selected based on their subject expertise, academic experience, and research background relevant to the submitted manuscript.
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript on the basis of:
• Originality and novelty of the research
• Relevance to the journal scope
• Clarity of objectives and research questions
• Adequacy of literature review
• Research methodology and data analysis
• Quality of discussion and conclusions
• Ethical compliance and proper referencing
• Overall presentation and academic contribution
Reviewer Recommendations
Based on the reviewer’s comments and recommendations, the editorial board may take one of the following decisions:
• Accept Manuscript
• Accept with Minor Revisions
• Resubmit after Major Revisions
• Reject Manuscript
Authors are expected to revise and resubmit the manuscript within the prescribed time if revisions are requested by reviewers or editors.
Confidentiality and Ethical Standards
The journal maintains confidentiality throughout the review process. Reviewers and editors are expected to handle manuscripts responsibly and ethically. Unpublished information from submitted manuscripts must not be used for personal research or professional benefit.
AIJMRP follows COPE Guidelines and expects authors, reviewers, and editors to maintain the highest standards of academic integrity, transparency, fairness, and ethical publishing practices.
Final Decision and Publication
The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of a manuscript is taken by the Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board based on reviewer reports, editorial evaluation, and the overall quality of the manuscript. Accepted manuscripts proceed to editing, proofreading, formatting, and publication in the upcoming issue of the journal.
The Editorial Team of Adhigamy International Journal of Modern Research Perspectives (AIJMRP) is committed to ensuring a transparent, ethical, and high-quality peer review system that promotes excellence in academic research and scholarly communication.
```
